- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old8 q& U2 \$ k6 y5 U+ j
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
- D" l S" f% c4 ]- x. KExposure to Testosterone3 R5 ]/ E1 F- b8 H3 ?* ~, L' |4 z0 g
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
) U( z9 e1 H8 @1 Xand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD16 P% q5 F- I' B! d
Clinical Pediatrics
' j7 X! q1 {" e+ h3 BVolume 46 Number 6
7 i- _' }' a5 V! L# E, GJuly 2007 540-543
|: e6 y ~/ ]9 ]1 I% d" _© 2007 Sage Publications
) u; _0 B( y; D6 T9 m10.1177/0009922806296651( L& H8 o2 a% L- r! `* R9 v. q
http://clp.sagepub.com
, y* P( V) j: T9 ^5 N/ nhosted at
/ g5 s9 k2 p/ g- V: r$ z o4 ~! vhttp://online.sagepub.com2 K x% @ g/ h
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
& j! N- Z. \5 @8 iis a significant concern for physicians. Central' R: P4 M: N% A/ s
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated% W# r/ S* u: P+ b, L1 }. r
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has+ `2 [& ] M) C) {* p
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
2 Z# {3 p: D1 c- {9 llesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
5 l. ^4 D- ?3 a' dby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic c* C, O( ~; E. {7 o3 f
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-5 K* F% n# h8 N0 q' p g
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
# N1 }. U. l4 H: j9 greport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the% B$ A4 H5 S3 p R0 x6 ]) w! d
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
- Z3 W, Q b' W7 p7 q' ]ment without testicular enlargement, which was due; R, y! M" k) @ e2 ?* Y0 P3 C7 q
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by6 n- R# Y" L! t( h+ D) N6 U
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-' l: v" H- {4 F) e) G/ z `
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this/ x% ^# |. q( Y3 L: n( y, j2 { a; G
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of/ s/ Y9 I5 t- x
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-4 U2 n1 t* a0 K' N3 Z5 Y* i
bly more common than the rare case report in the
4 J, A- c0 M* O! G- G+ ~literature.4% H6 W/ [/ T% h3 b
Patient Report/ B# M5 `! k* t3 m
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
: l2 F. s! ]# G: ^( l5 Qendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
+ C) ^4 t; o+ T y, U" \8 Uof early sexual development. His mother noticed1 e. S' g. f5 ~! j* U
light colored pubic hair development when he was
, O# d1 a8 f/ D3 t) n0 UFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of, d& V. W: u# [8 X" o/ d
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.; Q6 R: j" b, M. T
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
3 z6 F# g3 l! G- e1 kProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
* Z' A4 N7 }8 P1 S" }( _Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;6 E* {7 n9 ^4 ^9 \. `( g
e-mail: [email protected].3 k( H0 R! V( t$ `. s5 N `6 p
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
, U' ]/ a# |( F3 U' wdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
8 a& ~: M8 u# T: M, W! z' q- }ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
8 T- E( a( ^1 v9 E- ~9 g3 ?& mwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
: z* j( h$ U: l% da birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of9 H! M$ [+ V- d- \/ v; `. e
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year O1 N a" I% @/ H& H' Z1 c
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with9 c' R# h. q( g
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,$ _) ]5 I- E; P& H: d" z# ]" @% e" l
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development- E: J8 f4 J0 n0 @: B, M# K5 D
was age appropriate.1 s! S$ s4 ~' @' Y) I
The family history was remarkable for the father,
/ w' \. c4 ?) Y' ^ [. L# g4 lwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,/ D4 L3 ^9 j/ c( Y! P
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
5 R8 N ?% M3 t" Q8 A" vheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat) D& C0 d9 V/ W; j' Q
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
6 z7 U; h- o5 L8 H( M7 b1 mThe father denied taking any other medication. The1 p" _) U; d( I
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
' n- b% R& h- D' T: h) w2 |6 v' [ m$ ywas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet: ]! z9 b* D$ r9 E& \$ ?- Y/ h
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre- g T! g9 U% v( Z
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-: B' V, P" U0 Z
tives. There were no siblings.3 c/ A! i( F# b( [+ u/ A' Z' F7 b$ G3 J' t
Physical Examination
# o5 @, {) S, h, MThe physical examination revealed a very active,
! n. U6 X+ ? w0 c. z6 k; v- Cplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented: S/ U/ v0 @8 q) l8 ^" y: g6 r0 Q
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was( h" A) f6 g4 u; P E
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
% ?# {( u4 a5 S: P1 ^6 c) b(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth$ S8 t, T: R' x( L0 a/ \
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of' S, i( i5 G1 I+ M
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.! B7 _( T* m6 s/ W
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
; l* E6 `- g# R. W4 q! z$ l! e2 Qenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of4 j# W) A/ t2 ~% b4 M
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well: p7 J. V1 a& q% @+ c9 c
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
' |+ Y/ x o- K, r6 L `540( M3 O$ N1 z4 `
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
4 z$ L0 Y3 i# q; L' b. gthe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
2 ]1 D' N) f( B$ \( Stesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
+ W* A I# b; L% s. c6 T$ \4 l0 RThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
( }$ |' `3 k+ }oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no5 @* d, B) i- C3 J
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
1 O0 |" s! _- P* G2 B7 CNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+; L9 Q4 ~8 g6 `; {8 R' @$ z. l
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
- g! g# H! ^' [7 P7 mof papilledema.
0 L+ A+ {6 k p& xLaboratory Evaluation
1 k- h: r5 M) P2 BThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
" y- q7 R$ {& Iusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
# {( ?( d& {4 p0 `# e7 J) B7 v5 llogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal. Z0 S1 { M& e8 l9 }6 d1 x# H, G
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
+ S1 ~0 s$ I; T9 K$ G- y. Jshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-/ z3 ~% W( x2 h+ R3 b' M! I$ l1 z- C/ R
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
8 m* T/ R/ m$ HThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
s' ^5 d, C# B3 J3 f9 R- [1 m [urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were+ P- x; H2 M, p# m% K; o8 E
within normal range for his age. The concentration
7 _% l' N% W3 z' e1 Dof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
2 ?% `* z4 A1 p" J7 p' @. @(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 209 {- h/ C7 B$ G" M F
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
9 T3 @: o- d5 j5 c8 d% xterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
; G f; ~, Z+ u4 f3 X+ K9 ?! ?desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to' b2 Z: Z- M& U4 R
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
0 n& f ~4 ?, ~! Vwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
% X" G8 q% V, H. \ U' \tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total2 u( ~) A( F" c- c* L
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
) @+ f5 t G; hand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
4 P% z( h C: E9 R9 E, h5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular& ^- J, ^0 s$ Z2 L Z* G. J
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone# z& ?7 T/ h9 j/ D% o; _- r, k
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL0 I0 ]$ {5 G" G1 h q$ _
(prepubertal).
' s# d, o' t: `* C8 J7 gThe parents were notified about the laboratory6 L/ A5 o& H+ C7 L2 H. E% b) |
results and were informed that all of the tests were
# O4 l7 y5 V9 [( _5 l1 snormal except the testosterone level was high. The
2 K e( ]) u# F+ B7 T, Ufollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
% y: Z: x# K8 c* V* g1 Iobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
3 m0 R# S/ ?% C( O4 Gever, the family did not return for 4 months.
# u2 a. N9 C y1 T0 C/ yPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
; m0 r, b$ m6 Y u1 }5 W, `child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
3 y& I, h a3 d4 _4 z: k2 Z2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
2 ]9 N) ~! d2 P9 a7 {5 v/ n, d5 zunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-1 L' s$ a9 O, t) {) l, |: a( m6 R
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
; j7 L3 {% `. @% B3 Xthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2* Q7 r7 d- f5 J
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
0 v w' b/ r2 {7 c \The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
3 S* M6 k8 l% M+ z: @8 @6 king frequent erections.7 ?1 n3 r2 K6 v ]: f
Both parents were again questioned about use of1 K9 Y+ W- f @8 g0 K& N
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to8 o! _5 k) \9 _" c7 w6 i3 N! l
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the" B& q- W5 Z3 G! Y
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541! O+ c# D* }4 {, S
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
/ m& E- C, N* P; M- u3 `9 ping over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
% d Q d) n; |! B6 Ga year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
+ m. V, r- ^+ l0 V- V) rto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-5 o( v/ I6 Y2 w( {8 L4 w
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido* ]$ i/ W$ r' ~6 Z
secondary to depression. [/ z# H2 c$ H! `# t& x: O* H7 H0 |
The child slept in the same bed with parents.
\# V0 [; e! U% u+ `' j* vThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his2 e1 R& k) X1 V1 R% v
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-% l6 Y5 w. o8 N; C1 r% r
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
' s% F) u2 O% Q( v; L( vThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
! A& ^9 V4 `/ x: o1 {, S* W( h) gwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
( R% ^8 X5 _0 ], m6 Cwas high, he then read the product information. l, w# V+ z |
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
& `, N0 g4 h4 B/ T1 _/ g, z; Pson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
" o, ?7 {+ r* u$ }decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
( w. w3 N/ q4 R/ ?2 S# K' o$ [father was not hugging him with bare skin and had# F, O% e' l1 S$ J- Y! R
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone# D$ |! p. c; R5 h8 W& ~
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
\. L' p4 H( `% m! n. C) Dlaboratory to obtain the test.1 z$ y4 J/ O( {- {4 y
Discussion
8 G0 n6 d; K1 f* ^7 [# APrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary% g9 u+ S& P7 d) [$ W
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
9 A* {$ s1 }/ K" ^) X3 y. KPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
C% y! r+ h7 Z' nit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-3 z! Q7 L1 n8 ]
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
7 U( U4 E! d& }* a: e( imon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP6 ]( {1 l9 E9 N h3 B- N0 u% Q
may have a central nervous system lesion that is$ D# T1 f* p6 H d: ]
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-6 i9 ] L4 r, A9 X9 b/ D x' g
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-4 J9 E9 f! ?5 s4 g* o! _
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
( p4 F+ ?1 o: B* q) V7 Z; p) y0 Sboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
/ G1 E! c0 a. k3 j+ @ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
( |, f, j" B7 }# b4 U& a5 o9 Jrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by U/ f# n. |* j1 H( _- D
gonadotropins.1,3. B7 Y) K( v+ i
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
5 }) o! H/ [! n! Vcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate& B- a+ P' h5 N/ h/ X0 J/ j
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or3 d- W# P' g- v3 z, G1 \6 t% m
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-& F/ ^' P. U j# j; B- ]# O
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
2 a+ U0 T- o1 Zcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
3 J: J* ~6 D y4 \; Xadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
% T4 [; v# k5 R! m) A. q! npuberty in boys.3,49 \( t! ^/ T O& R! M
The most common form of congenital adrenal
" Q% U! i* Z& F. D$ t7 Mhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
; [# R3 Z2 L/ ~! c4 I$ i, x. \The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in4 ^( a+ v. V: a4 K" M* a
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
$ w5 X6 Z) p1 ~& ~, }- k6 ^an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen7 S! U7 V3 R9 b8 M& F' f/ P
excess.1,3+ Y4 T% M1 |1 d# d1 z# q
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
. J* S8 y, e; q0 d0 K6 i H" J2 d542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20079 s" j2 \% X+ ]8 C# N1 Q! D
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-, t2 z/ W0 S+ o* l
independent precocious puberty, which is also known
# s: T8 O& I( das testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a; o# P4 B( s6 ]$ {4 g) }
very young age. The physical findings in these boys! u" t. s, W. m7 x; t
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
h- S7 m' O8 c8 P9 Uincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys& O8 e- y7 h# g& G% s8 M2 c
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
$ S E6 M1 B( B0 N* E3 gare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show: t. t5 W( w: u4 a5 @
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-/ F# ?8 U$ u- ?2 H3 O: b- w! N
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
4 X: G" a/ x' R) e3 B9 }3 ~autosomal dominant disorder that affects only
/ ?$ e5 {( u0 _) M5 }: C9 qmales; therefore, other male members of the family
! ^( l3 ]3 q5 Fmay have similar precocious puberty.3
2 O6 \& L3 O! x) p$ b% }; dIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
" R9 `: v* B: ~5 osistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
, ^; p! s4 w+ s$ q' ]' \: @cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis6 _" x) M. w# Q; a9 |' L* P) r
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
+ v5 s- D6 u* O9 N+ ustarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
5 ]" d! _. `8 R. n' Y7 b1 W, v* Ttesticular enlargement is not that evident in the* k I- Z0 C5 D
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
F# m" w6 O+ pative initial history of androgen exposure, our
) u' L0 }, M" dbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
3 b) v" E1 l0 \% k2 Heither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase( v" M& ? Y& g
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-7 F4 ?: Z/ y/ o, l2 d- ?7 ~
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
/ E7 z0 x( b2 K f# EThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly. X( j+ h. a/ \) r: c
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because2 p% W8 X5 \' z7 W& [* M7 U% ~$ g
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
0 X: D! B# }( G* h1 B ] g/ z% a0 z; lpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and. k* @9 `5 X: ^& R$ `$ Z
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
! ]* g1 z# m$ K& ^ d2 w/ e8 vterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was- Y( `) u _6 K) w/ y9 `6 k
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
" d% r. z1 [ _Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
2 N4 g! W* _5 ]: @% b, x9 a- Q3 hcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
d. e, B1 E! E/ I" lunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
# w X1 Z+ [1 h0 s$ M7 D- J# KSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the# F0 O/ c0 ?" _
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
& p! \- i: Z) Xeven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male0 v. M. O/ M- Z; {4 w. m1 \
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
) v, P* U: [- c( @2 \0 `' G7 d1 Xtion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.& v* C$ ^9 k' n# o
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
: t. c U5 u1 g. @" l( [7 V5 d5 [which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
6 }1 ^, t/ I% K- jdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
2 t1 u3 E+ a9 dterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more+ _9 E* D! g# m6 K7 Q
active in young children exposed to testosterone
7 I6 Y P- x. J' i7 Xexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-( W+ @; D; j, K5 R. G
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
! f- M, e0 i0 q8 F/ }5 kvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
5 j% u) s, \# n+ E# n# Pchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
6 [' n& A/ d- Q% _advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
% v8 M. S" t; GThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during% d5 Z+ `& Y+ f* m
early childhood on pubertal development and final
! x m' L: G. a, @. C5 G7 } f4 [adult height are not fully known and always remain! c& t# [7 F# B% D, Q. s/ M
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-+ B6 o; f& g' p. e0 s3 z
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some o5 G) z) a1 W: d$ s) X0 n
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
' M$ J) i5 j! n2 H8 X6 r, z+ ] ~cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
) I' V: b' n3 Y, Q) ]decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
& l9 c( R( V5 K" V! K" QThere are conflicting reports and controversy
0 c% w8 j0 m, M4 m8 x- _over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
4 M* _+ N: J9 X% I4 A/ c2 Tpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal$ \: @; K( ~) z2 I- \7 y
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-& q4 [" m& |9 Y; T Z9 ~
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
( n7 M5 }1 M& o- N2 o5 bSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
9 r9 `" N% \6 U5 ]8 ?* ?$ n) A( qchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
0 c4 }9 g, V, h3 K7 v: rpenile length in clinical studies.; O# Q: I& j7 H2 Z" E( U
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is* B% v. q/ n' _7 H1 ~
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
4 b0 F! j4 E) C& e0 gtestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because- g2 ~- }* J# N+ o) J$ ^9 w
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
7 k3 Z) s5 \9 G o1 fAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of( B! d& I- l/ q% s; G
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at2 t2 E. Q* G$ i( T: f6 P
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
# n4 D4 w9 G4 @3 M- @( Uheight will not be affected.+ x( l) F' B5 b% L, y; ~4 [
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-( E" _& s* _. I9 C! f+ @$ b
ability of androgen products in our society may
! b- F+ {2 ?% s/ h+ \indeed cause more virilization in male or female5 D. p3 G9 v: ]9 J/ M
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
3 A. _2 C- Y1 d4 vgen products must be considered and specific ques-
+ b+ ?4 j' W6 F: |/ H5 ntioning about the use of a testosterone product or
) `/ e3 Q+ g0 W9 T9 ugel should be asked of the family members during
6 Y7 P3 d4 Q9 |' ]9 g4 ?$ xthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-0 V9 r$ |& e1 e: j0 W' n2 z5 N6 `, f
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
V' K3 S4 D' x, f1 g6 M! F2 |nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
9 e+ P8 H! U/ N# w* q% Fappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
. w C4 K+ X, i# Ihistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
# c* w6 S) X3 H" q; Hresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
* C6 | ~; N6 P q; y" s" finvestigation. The primary care physician should be
6 F) e7 w5 ^0 I0 @$ Gaware of this fact, because most of these children
: y- ]- q8 s( d; o' m5 ]" }0 imay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’+ T+ S+ O2 l- {) g2 k5 p
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a0 `3 `/ s2 m6 o8 [ u+ y6 k8 I2 t
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
+ b" D* l, d# {female child who might come in contact with some-
, l$ m" J# A+ h5 a0 O% b+ a6 Fone using any of these products.
3 y# S, ]0 S" ^ ?, dReferences- N! T& l, L; }5 F, x
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
! P, `1 y: V: g4 S& N1 c7 K7 Eand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
% b+ M' B, y) R/ {% cEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;: K4 h% \/ K2 Q. _" r0 ]; n
2002: 565-628.
6 L0 V& k, O3 i2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious) B7 w/ A! p3 Q& {
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|